You are here:   Text > Was Crucifixion a Jewish Penalty?

Yohanan's foot: his bones were discovered in Jerusalem in 1968

The idea of crucifixion, for many people linked to the story of Jesus, is in general associated with Rome's infliction of "the most cruel and abominable form of execution" (Cicero) on foreigners and slaves. Jesus of Nazareth, condemned by Pontius Pilate, governor of Judaea (26-36 CE), is unquestionably the most famous victim of this brutal death penalty to die on the cross. It would occur to few, if any, outside the select company of specialists to inquire whether the cross might have had a role in the Jewish legal system towards the end of the pre-Christian era.

It is hardly necessary to point out that in the contemporary Western world the idea of the death penalty is generally abhorred. Many see it as judicial murder. Disapproval of capital punishment is quietly backed by the United Nations' call for a moratorium on executions in the countries where it is still on the statute book, and the European Union has outlawed it. However, this 21st-century outlook stands in stark contrast with the worldview expressed in biblical and late antique Judaism, whose religious and social ethics were inherited by nascent Christianity.

The legal systems of Jewish antiquity were developed in two periods: the biblical era, reflected in the books of the Hebrew Scripture (c. 1000-500 BCE), and the age of the Rabbis, based on the earliest code, the Mishnah, and further developed in the Talmud (c. 200-500 CE). The intervening epoch, known also as the Second Temple period, represented by the Apocrypha, the Pseudepigrapha or pseudonymous extra-biblical writings, the Dead Sea Scrolls and the monumental literary output of Flavius Josephus (37-c. 100 CE), takes us down to the end of the first century of the Common Era. The question of crucifixion, as part of Jewish penal law, arose during those centuries and left copious marks not only in Josephus, but also in the Targums, the Aramaic paraphrases of the Hebrew Scriptures, which although reaching their finally redacted form between the third and seventh centuries CE, preserve much earlier, at times pre-Christian, traditions.

The Hebrew Bible, the Old Testament of the Christians, does not provide a systematic presentation of criminal law and the relevant passages must be collected from various places in four books of the Pentateuch: Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy. Dispersed in them figure no fewer than eight types of offence punishable by death.

View Full Article
November 23rd, 2018
3:11 PM

April 11th, 2013
11:04 AM
Simply use CE for Christian Era and BCE for Before Christian Era, simples! And it doesn’t half annoy the "academicians".

Marina DeLuca
April 11th, 2013
12:04 AM
The key behind this piece is the use of the term "CE" as opposed to AD. The "academicians" a while back figured out a clever way to avoid mentioning any reference to God ', and hence, Anno Domine was changed to the Common Era, and BC (Before Christ) was changed to BCE. Oh yes, the article; this is simply a way of suggesting that the Jews had nothing to do with the crucifixion of Jesus Christ––it was a Roman thing, you know. Really?

April 4th, 2013
1:04 PM
Interestingly Josephus records in Antiquities of the Jews, (xx.9)that the High Priest Ananus ben Ananus took advantage of a hiatus between Roman governors to assemble a Sanhedrin who condemned James, the brother of Jesus, "on the charge of breaking the law," then had him executed by stoning. This has been dated to AD 62. The version of the death recorded by the church historian Eusebius says James was thrown from the pinnacle of the Temple before being stoned.

Post your comment

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.