You are here:   Civilisation >  Screen > Spooked by Islamists
Spooked by Islamists
January/February 2010

Matt Damon as Jason Bourne: Killing machine who became a target 

A year after the 9/11 atrocities, I made a documentary for Channel 4 which involved trying to discover what had happened to terrorist suspects the prison service was holding without charge. The director filmed me putting questions to a low-level functionary at the Home Office press office. We hoped he would stonewall and thus unwittingly illustrate a sequence about Whitehall secrecy. Fortunately for us, he obfuscated like a true PR. Channel 4 wanted a witty line in the commentary to emphasise how hard it was to extract information that should be freely available. The best I could manage was "It's easier to have a beer with Osama bin Laden than get this government to answer a question." I accept that I was never going to get the viewers rolling off their sofas and clutching their aching sides, but the commissioning editor's response took me aback. Absolutely not. Cut it out. It's offensive.

But we were at war with al-Qaeda, I protested. Osama bin Laden is the enemy of this country and its best values. Why should I worry about offending him? He was equally taken aback by my insubordination. Like the Home Office press office, he did not think he had to answer presumptuous questions from journalists. After spending years watching the London media class at work and play, I guessed that three emotions were whirring round in his mind:

1) Fear. Ever since the Rushdie affair, British editors have feared that criticism of radical Islamists will lead to attacks on their staff and, more pertinently, on themselves. Suppressed panic explains why British newspapers did not follow European and indeed Middle Eastern newspapers in running the Danish cartoons of Muhammad. Although it is absurd to believe that a weak joke about bin Laden would provoke jihadis into bombing Channel 4's glass and steel headquarters in Westminster, cowards die many times before their deaths and once cowed editors have killed one story, they will kill hundreds more.

2) Racism. Although few television executives say so explicitly, most believe that the bulk of British Muslims support al-Qaeda in an inchoate way. Offending the enemy therefore means offending multiculturalism. If the accusation of "Islamophobia" carries any meaning, it must condemn the assumption that all Muslims are terrorist sympathisers. Although they say they don't accept the calumny in theory, most in television behave as if they do in practice.

3) Conformism. Once small bands of people have established a prohibition, it is ferociously difficult to shake them out of it. British TV managers are indistinguishable in class, beliefs and tastes. They socialise with each other and swap information and jobs. As any anthropologist will tell you, taboo-breakers in a closed society risk the censure of the tribe.

View Full Article
Ash Walsh
January 3rd, 2010
9:01 PM
I knew it was a matter of time before I came across somebody else that noticed.

Steve Jacks
December 19th, 2009
11:12 PM
I'm fairly sure there was another Spooks episode early on where it was made to look like Extremist Islamists were up to their old tricks . . . but . . . it was actually some white British anti-mass-immigration-types with the aid of an MP from an unnamed party (UKIP? Tory?) who were trying to stir up trouble. 'Cos that happens the whole time, yeah! When people talk about BIAS at the BBC, they're not so much talking about party political bias in their news output (they attack both parties equally - for being too right-wing) people are more talking about a cultural bias in nearly every episode of every drama, in nearly every episode of every 'comedy' . . . etc. The BBC can go and do one.

Ya Mama
December 19th, 2009
4:12 PM
im not 100% on this, but wasn't harry actually taken by the russians? it wasn't the hindus. and although the most recent ep, which i agree was ridiculous, *focussed* on the hindus, the plot was actually double. there was also an islamist terror cell that CO19 took down, while lucas dealt with the hindus. and the episode ended with pakistan about to kick off. i'd agree that spooks is, uh, not the most realistic of shows. but the whole of season six was about the evil iranians and the whole of seven (and much of this one) about the evil russians.

Post your comment

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.