You are here:   Columns >  Politics > Heathens and heretics
Fanatical religious and political movements reserve a special hatred for heretics. Heathens have never seen the light. They know no better. But heretics once knew the way and the truth and the life, and wilfully rejected it. They must be punished: not only for their own sins, but also as a warning to others of the cost of stepping out of line.

The explosion of interest in groupthink, which the crisis of the early 21st century has provoked, misses the rationality of the tactics of irrational movements. However absurd their ideologies may be, it is logical for a sectarian group to make heretical men and women who question them suffer.

The British Right has done so by sinking so deeply into the language of civil war it has whipped up death threats against pro-European Conservative MPs. Pick their denunciations apart and you can see that the cries of “mutineer”, “quisling” and “enemy of the people” condemn two distinct types of treason. In a hyperbolic moment, a proponent of a hard Brexit could regard supporters of continued membership of the EU or a compromise with Brussels as traitors in the conventional sense: they wish to limit British sovereignty by an alliance with foreign states.

But the type of treachery that spurs them to fury is the treason fellow conservatives commit when they break with the groupthink of conventional right-wing wisdom. The heretic has inside knowledge and is thus the most dangerous of opponents. He or she (and in the case of Brexit it tends to be a she because the bravest Conservative politicians are women) knows the Right’s faults and can expose them with far more authority than a leftist. Outsiders’ attacks can be discounted. Often they are welcomed, for everyone enjoys baiting their enemies. Rebellious insiders, however, can turn the accusation of treason against the group and say that its leaders are the true betrayers of the Conservative cause as their Brexit harms business and wreck attempts to control the national debt.

Just as Brexit is destroying the Conservatives’ reputation for being the party of practical politicians, so Corbynism is destroying Labour’s reputation as being the party for the well-meaning. The wildness of the online hatred, the emergence of the British Left as a racist force, appears paradoxical because its members think of themselves as virtuous. Corbyn himself adopts a saint-like pose and maintains that he is against “personal abuse, name calling, calling into question the character of other people”. His saintliness ought to be a warning that the paradox is no paradox at all. The Left’s quasi-religious belief in its own virtue gives it the right to treat all who reject it as the secular equivalents of Satan and all his works.

Dissenters are “Tories,” “Zionists,” “Blairites”. These words have long ago lost their meanings. They are curses that place the damned beyond the bounds of the virtuous congregation. A Blairite is not a supporter of Tony Blair from the last decade but anyone who doubts the Labour leadership up to and including men and women who opposed Blair when he was in power. “Zionist” and “Zio” are now synonyms for “Jew”, and applied to all opponents of Corbyn, Jewish or not. Just as traditional anti-Semitism cast the Jews as Christ killers, so modern anti-Semitism casts the Jews as Corbyn killers, motivated by their greed for money and Palestinian land.
View Full Article

Post your comment

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.