You are here:   Blogs >The Point > The Cabinet meeting that kept Salman Rushdie alive
Standpoint Blogs
The Point
Thursday 6th December 2012
The Cabinet meeting that kept Salman Rushdie alive

In a letter to Standpoint, published in the latest issue of the magazine, Nigel Lawson reveals the Cabinet's unanimous support for Special Branch protection of Salman Rushdie when, in 1989, Ayatollah Khomeini, the Supreme Leader of Iran, issued a fatwa against the Satanic Verses author and offered a bounty for his death.

The decision to protect Rushdie was taken "at no little diplomatic cost and public expense," writes Lawson who says he "actively participated in the Cabinet meeting which decided, nem con, that this must be done". Lord Lawson, who sits on Standpoint's advisory board and was Chancellor of the Exchequer when the fatwa was issued, was writing in response to a review by Nick Cohen of Rushdie's new memoir, Joseph Anton. Here is the letter in full:

Masquerading as a review of Salman Rushdie's autobiography, Nick Cohen's odiously self-satisfied diatribe ("The Dreyfus Affair of our Age", November) takes the opportunity to heap abuse on, inter alios, Margaret Thatcher and a number of her Cabinet colleagues-as indeed did Rushdie himself, in the years leading up to the publication of The Satanic Verses.

He concludes in these words: "Rushdie's autobiography has two sets of heroes, who look all the more heroic when set against the politicians and intellectuals of Left and Right. The liberal chattering classes, who are the butt of so much mockery, behaved impeccably . . . The other heroes are the protection officers of the 'A Squad' of the Metropolitan Police's Special Branch, who worked on the Rushdie 'prot' and maintained their honourable record of keeping their charges alive.'

Who on earth does he (and, indeed, Rushdie) think was responsible for taking the decision to instruct the Special Branch to do just this, at no little diplomatic cost and public expense? I write as one who actively participated in the Cabinet meeting which decided, nem con, that this must be done.

Nigel Lawson, House of Lords, London SW1

Like this article? Share, save or print using the icons below
Delicious   Digg   StumbleUpon   Propeller   Reddit   Magnoliacom   Newsvine   Furl   Facebook   Google   Yahoo   Technorati   Icerocket   Print   Mail   Twitter   
December 17th, 2012
9:12 AM
They may have authorised Rushdie's police protection but they were obliged to. Either the quotes attributed to Thatcher,Hurd,Straw etc are true or they aren't. If they are, then Cohen's criticism of them is justified.

Maria MacLachlan
December 6th, 2012
2:12 PM
Are we supposed to be impressed that the government of the day decided to protect a British citizen who had broken no law against an assassination attempt from abroad?

Post your comment

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
About The Point

The Point is Standpoint's staff blog.

Recent Blog Posts
Blog List
More Posts
Popular Standpoint topics