You are here:   Blogs >Joshua Rozenberg > Intestate Cohabitants
Standpoint Blogs
 
 
Joshua Rozenberg
Thursday 29th October 2009
Intestate Cohabitants

Are the government's law reform advisers undermining marriage by proposing intestacy benefits for cohabitants? Or is the Law Commission simply trying to save money?

Most readers of this blog will know that there is no such thing as a "common-law spouse". However, people who live together as a couple, but who are not married or in a civil partnership, can - and should - make wills to ensure that the survivor receives on death whatever the first-to-die regards as appropriate. That is because an unmarried or unregistered cohabitant will not receive a legacy under the intestacy laws, which govern what happens when someone dies without leaving a valid will.

What's perhaps less well known is that the survivor of unmarried or unregistered cohabitants who have been living together "as man and wife" or  "as civil partners" for at least two years immediately before one of them dies can claim reasonable family provision under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975. But that may require legal action and will certainly involve paying for lawyers.

So the Law Commission is provisionally proposing that the law should say what many people think it says already. The survivor of two cohabitants would receive the same as a surviving spouse if the couple had lived together for at least five years before the death. If they had cohabited for less than five years but more than two years, the survivor would receive half. If they were the parents of a child, there would be no minimum duration requirement.

Back to my question: does this undermine marriage? The Law Commission says not: are people really not going to get married if what is now discretionary becomes automatic? Maybe not. But I suspect it will undermine will-writing.

 
Like this article? Share, save or print using the icons below
Delicious   Digg   StumbleUpon   Propeller   Reddit   Magnoliacom   Newsvine   Furl   Facebook   Google   Yahoo   Technorati   Icerocket   Print   Mail   Twitter   
Share/Save
 
 
 
Recusant
October 30th, 2009
10:10 AM
Of course it undermines marriage. At the moment you have a choice as to whether you want your 'cohabitee' to inherit automatically upon your death, it's called getting married. How do you define a cohabitee as being in a relationship of intimacy rather than just sharing a residence? Well getting married tends to signal that quite well.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
 
About Joshua Rozenberg

Joshua Rozenberg is an independent legal commentator who presents Law in Action on BBC Radio 4.

Recent Blog Posts
Blog List
More Posts
Popular Standpoint topics