You are here:   Civilisation >  Critique > Pope Benedict's New Testament

Captivated audience: Pope Benedict XVI on his recent visit to London (PA) 

Eleanor goes to Mass most days. Every day, really, but she feels a little guilty — almost as though it doesn't count — when she misses the early morning service and has to sneak away from her co-workers to make the noon Mass at St Vincent de Paul's on West 23rd.

That's Fr Gerald Murray's parish, there in the canyons of Manhattan, its 1930s stone façade pushed out to join the line of the buildings on either side, as flat against the sidewalk as a storefront. No portico, no entryway, no playground, no churchyard: this is a building grimly determined to march out and grab for sacred purposes every inch the freehold and the zoning laws of New York allow.

St Vincent's was a French-speaking parish, once upon a time. Back in the days when the French still went to church. Back in the days when the city needed daily Mass for its transient Parisians and United Nations staff. The main Sunday service is still in French — a few dozen Francophone African immigrants in the pews — but the archdiocese has vague plans to close the parish down. They were active plans, in fact, before a new archbishop, a lot more sympathetic to Fr Murray's conservatism and pro-life activism, was installed in 2009.

Anyway, Eleanor follows all this stuff: the ins and outs of diocesan politics, the preachers who can be counted upon to deliver orthodox homilies, the priests who can be trusted to perform a Mass with solemnity, significance, and some gesture toward beauty. She'd go to Our Saviour over on Park Avenue for the sermons of Fr George Rutler — now there's a priest who can be trusted — but it's another 15 blocks uptown and clear over on the east side, and she doesn't have time to make the journey there and back in the lunch hour.

View Full Article
Michael W.
August 24th, 2011
9:08 PM
"John Paul II was always two steps ahead of his critics, escaping the rigid either-or categories into which they tried to push him by finding the new both-and possibilities that come from integrating Vatican II into the long tradition of the Church." This statement is plainly wrong: John Paul II divided the culture of death from the culture of light, which lead to a polarisation within the Church. Furthermore, when attending Vatican II Karol Woytila voted against the reforms introduced. It is accepted by now that he tried to reverse changes made by the council and re-defined the previously vaguely defined term "magisterium" as the teaching authority of the whole body of the bishops, as papal teaching. Indeed, he is in the tradition of Pio Nono and Paul X rather than John XXXIII.

April 15th, 2011
1:04 PM
I think you have hit the nail on the head. It is indeed providential that JPII and BXVI were elected pope at this crucial period of Catholic history - 1980s until today. They have both succeeded in steering the vast rambling Catholic Church back to central track of tradition rooted in the Gospel from which it had strayed after Vatican II (not because of Vatican II but because of the misinterpretations by liberals of the Council). The Church is so much richer and complex than the reductionist abstractions of the liberal intelligentsia.

Gabriel Austin
April 9th, 2011
6:04 PM
You write: "Benedict will win no prizes for his prose". May one presume that you have read the volumes in the original German?

Post your comment

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.