You are here:   Counterpoints > If Only

The latest in if-only economics comes from Japan. The central bank’s new governor, Haruhiki Kuroda, plans to print more yen until the rate of inflation reaches 2 per cent — on its way up, that is. There, with any luck, it will meet our own rate of inflation, coming down. Then we can all relax.

It is to Sir Kit McMahon, who was deputy governor of the Bank of England, that we owe the concept of if-only economics. This consisted (he said) of picking one economic indicator and hanging policy on it like a hat-peg, or using it as a target, in the belief that if only we could hit it, everything would be all right. If only.

Not for a long time has the Bank hit the target Gordon Brown set for it: inflation at 2 per cent, as measured by an index of his own choosing. A series of boilerplate letters from the governor — the last one was in February — purport to explain why the target was missed. These letters cannot quite say that, with the economy in its present state, something had to give, and this was it.

We have had quite a run of if-only targets: first for the money supply (Sir Kit was a sceptic) and then for the pound — if only we could join the European exchange rate mechanism. Moral: be careful what you wish for. Inflation targeting seemed to work better, thanks to cheap Chinese imports and an index that excluded housing. So house prices could and did rocket, but that did not count as inflation.

View Full Article

Post your comment

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.