You are here:   Economy > Banking on Allah
 

 
Traders at the sharia-compliant Saudi Investment Bank in Riyadh

Islamic banking is becoming increasingly accepted as a viable and fair alternative to the current "Western capitalist" banking system. European governments, including the UK's, are embracing Islamic banking. Gordon Brown recently declared that it was his desire to make Britain the Islamic finance capital of Europe. A number of leading UK banks now offer sharia-compliant financial services and the Treasury is considering the implementation of the sukok, or sharia-compliant, bond. Such moves fail to recognise Islamic banking for what it is — a modern Islamist construct, designed as another wedge between Western Muslims and their societies. 

Since the recession, Islamic banking's supporters have been seizing the opportunity to present it as not only a more moral option, but as an economically safer one. But there are three questions that need answering: How is Islamic banking different? Who are its biggest cheerleaders? Why are they pushing for it?

Among the many justifications for his declaration of war against America and its allies, Osama bin Laden cited the un-Islamic and evil nature of the Western financial system. In a November 2002 "Letter to America", he wrote: 

"You are a nation that permits usury, which has been forbidden by all the religions. You build your economy and investments on usury. As a result, in all their different forms and guises, the Jews have taken control of your economy..."

Prohibiting the use of interest is the raison d'être of Islamic banking, which claims not to deal in such greed — nor in other haram (forbidden) ventures, such as those involving pork, booze and gambling. There is little doubt that in seventh-century Arabia, the poor were exploited through a pre-Islamic tradition of usury, which would often lead to the doubling and tripling of the original debt. As bin Laden pointed out, usury was banned by all the major religions, and riba, meaning exploitative and excessive interest, was banned by the Koran. However, as with many Islamist ideas, an incorrect interpretation lies at the heart of the attempt to apply archaic principles to modern times.

Riba does not apply to the modern concept of interest, but to excessive and extreme rates of interest that present huge risks to the borrower and a minimal risk to the lender. Islamic banking claims that risk will be shared by both the borrower and lender. But the idea that a modern bank lender shares no risk with the borrower is patently ridiculous. A conventional bank has little incentive in seeing its borrowers fail, the obvious reason being that this increases the chances of them defaulting on loans. 

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Kinana
July 1st, 2009
8:07 AM
these are excellent points by Micawber. i would just like to emphasise that as one Muslim scholar said: ‘Islam raises goodness throughout the society, throwing the burden of taking care of the needy people over every member of the society (as can be felt by thinking of the zakah (charity money) paid by all muslims to all muslims ‘ Here we should note that Muslim charity, even when it is not for jihad is for Muslims ONLY.

Micawber
June 29th, 2009
6:06 AM
A good article which, however, misses the point that Sharia banking is meant to enforce Sharia on non-Moslems by applying Sharia funds only to those businesses which comply with Sharia law (for example, no businesses which deal with alcohol, pork, music, films, theatre or any religions other than Islam). This has the effect of extending the control of Moslem-owned businesses in areas and eventually dominating. But, more crucial than anything else, is the role of Zakat. Zakat is one of the Five Pillars of Islam, defined as alms-giving or charity. It is an obligation upon all Moslems to give Zakat according to their incomes. This can be given either directly to imams, mosques or Islamic 'charities.' Koran 9.60 specifies those for whom Zakat is collected and the purpose to which it is to be applied:- 1. The poor 2. Those who collect Zakat (mosques, imams, 'charities') 3. To attract the hearts of those who have been inclined (towards Islam) (Da'wa) 4. To free those in captivity 5. For those in debt 6. For "ALLAH'S CAUSE" (i.e. for Majahidun, those fighting in 'holy battle' JIHAD) 7. For the wayfarer "Thus, monies collected for alms in Islam (and this includes all Islamic 'charities' and all Islamic institutions which must give a portion of their collections and/or profits to Zakat) are, indeed, used to fund terrorism..." "...any businesses and financial institutions that engage in and offer Sharia Compliant Finance run the risk of legal action as conduits and intermediaries in funding terrorism and sedition." In the US, the Government recently won the largest terrorist-funding case in US legal history against Holy Land Foundation, an Islamic charity. The expression "for Allah's Cause", used throughout the Koran and Hadiths, always refers to warfare, Jihad. http://www.saneworks.us/uploads/application/28.pdf 'Civil Liability and Criminal Exposure for US Financial Institutions and Businesses Engaged in Shari'ah-Compliant Finance' I recommend also: http://www.shariahfinancewatch.org

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.