You are here:   Reputations >  Overrated > Norman Foster
 

We cannot escape the high-tech glass and metallic “global architecture” of Lord Foster of Thames Bank. He claimed that “the unique shape” of his Greater London Authority Building, the backwards­leaning testicular lump over which Boris Johnson now presides, and which disfigures the banks of the Thames, “was generated as a result of rigorous scientific analysis”.

The same process also produced Foster’s nearby Swiss Re building (the Gherkin), which, he boasted, “can be likened to a cigar or a bullet”, though it is hard to understand how a bullet could “respond”, as Foster claimed, “to the specific demands of the small site”. This giant, bulging tower overshadows Sir Christopher Wren’s St Helen’s Bishops­gate, yet Foster has dared pay lip service to the notion that “London is essentially a low-rise city”.

His Sainsbury Centre at the University of East Anglia and his Cambridge Law Faculty both house numerous varied functions in a single bubble of space, causing problems for those who have to work in them. Once the Law Faculty building was in use, for example, it was found that the library was so noisy that a large glass screen wall had to be inserted to remedy the situation. Yet Foster explained that before designing the building, “we had to ask ourselves, what is the essence of Cambridge?” Who would have guessed that the search for this essence would result in a sliced-off glass slug? Foster’s Stansted Airport terminal was considered successful ­because its glass walls enabled travellers to admire those parts of the Essex countryside that it had not destroyed. This was, of course, before the passion for airport retailing filled the interior with shops blocking its former transparency.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Frankly
January 15th, 2012
12:01 PM
Overrated does not even begin to describe it all. In my view, these overhyped Contemporary architects, and their hideous monstrosities, could not serve the architectural genius Quinlan Terry breakfast.

David
September 6th, 2009
10:09 AM
At last the Emperor's lack of clothes is revealed! Foster's dreadful shed at Nimes -( cheap social housing comminity centre?) has destroyed an elegant square and offers nothing but a few pathetic and increasingly shabby scafolding poles to 'compliment' one of the finest classical building in existence. That the neo classical theatre, a building of elegance and quality-unachievable today for cost reasons -should have been demolished for Foster's egotistical and sterile scruffy shed is a scandal and a tragedy. Let us hope it can be demolished before its time is up or the paint peels off = an empty space with a few trees would be preferable in the ruined city of Nimes.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.